| THE FACTS
BRIEF HISTORY OF LOST PROPOSITION 42 TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
In
2002, California voters approved Proposition 42 by almost a 70% margin,
redirecting the state's portion of sales tax on gasoline from the
General Fund to transportation programs. Approximately $1.1 billion in
Proposition 42 funds annually were supposed to start flowing in FY
2003-04. Out of the $2.4 billion expected from Proposition 42 for
FY 2003-04 and FY 2004-05, only $295 million has flowed to
transportation projects. The Governor has made it clear that due
to the FY 2005-06 deficit, channeling Proposition 42 funds from
transportation to the General Fund is once again a distinct possibility.
In
addition to the $2.1 billion, another $3.4 billion has been diverted
from transportation to the General Fund in the same time period as
shown in the table below:
DIRE STRAITS FOR CURRENT TRANSPORTATION FUNDING FLOW
The
combination of eliminated Proposition 42 funds and slower than expected
federal transportation funds coming to California has resulted in such
a severe cash flow crunch that no new project allocations have been approved since December 2002.
Only priority emergency and rehabilitation programs have been funded.
With barely enough cash to sustain $500 million in projects through
December 2004, the California Transportation Commission expects to
continue its moratorium on new project allocations from the State
Transportation Improvement Program and the Traffic Congestion Relief
Program. Additionally, the Commission will not be able to issue any new
GARVEE bonds, which have proved to be an innovative way to advance
funding.
Transportation
funding has been cut to the quick. Now, even the quick may have to be
cut. Without an infusion, the Commission may be forced to stop state
highway rehabilitation project allocations. With more than 50% of
California roads already in fair or poor condition, more deferrals of
Proposition 42 funds for General Fund purposes continue to put
Californians--especially emergency personnel--in harm's way as they
attempt to navigate through a congested and deteriorating road system.
PROMISED RELIEF IN PRECARIOUS POSITION
|
Even
though some funds earmarked for transportation could flow as a result
of the Governor's negotiated gaming compact, federal ethanol funds
returning to California and the passage of a federal transportation
reauthorization bill expected next year, all of these sources are now expected to provide less funding than anticipated during enactment of the FY 04-05 budget. Specifically,
the $1.2 billion from tribal gaming bonds is now estimated to generate
only $850 million. The ethanol fix, which will return $300 million to
California annually through 2010 won't begin to flow for two more
years. Finally, the much anticipated increase in federal transportation
funding remains on hold pending approval of a new federal
transportation program to replace the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century (TEA 21), which expired more than a year ago. As a
consequence, the transportation funding hole continues to deepen.
|
|
RECOMMENDATIONS
California's
budget crisis will not be resolved without some sacrifice in programs
across the state and/or an increase in revenue. However, transportation
has already made deep sacrifices for the past two years when
Proposition 42 suspensions, transfers and loans to the General Fund
programs have provided a safety valve for other state priorities.
Further cuts in transportation programs will harm California's economic
growth and resultant increase in general fund revenues. As the Governor
develops his FY 05-06 Budget scheduled for release in early January, we
urge the Administration and Legislature to resist further suspensions
or loans of Proposition 42 funds or any other transportation money to
the General Fund for a third consecutive year. Immediate transportation
infrastructure investments are necessary to ensure we not only reclaim
our moniker as the Golden State, but that we elevate that nickname to the Golden Dream by the Sea as offered by Governor Schwarzenegger.
|